A dozen years ago, paleontologist Stephen Gould stated there would never be another .400 hitter. Was he right?




Answers:

Where did the term "platinum sombrero" come from?

he was right, there will never be another .400 hitter. w/ the advance in technology now and the higher level of competition, there is no way a hitter can do it. if ted williams was at his peak today, im guessin his best avg season would of barely made .300. pitchers nowadays throw the ball much faster and have much more movement in their offspeed pitches than before..

Could we say this about a-rod?

No. Someone will come along that will defy logic just like Tiger did with Golf.

What is the lightest bat you are allowed in little league baseball (pitching machine)?

he's right so far, but eventually there might be another .400 hitter, but it's not likely.

Against which pitcher does Sammy Sosa have the most career at-bats without a home run?

as long as there is mlb he is wrong. as every year passes without the 400 being broken, he is right.

One reason why rocket should come back to houston?

No he was wrong. history repeats it self!

Will the braves win the series against the mets right now 1-1?

Never is a hard word to use in sports. It appears that with todays current crop of players 400 seems to be safe for a while. This being said, if Albert Pujols and A-Rod got traded to Colorado. Albert hitting 3rd and A-Rod protecticting him hitting 4th, I think Pujols could hit 400. Other than this senario happening, I do not see anyone hitting 400 for a long while.

Why is Ichiro's first name on the back of his jersey?

A dozen years ago, it was 1995, and we were just coming off a strike-shortened year that saw Tony Gwynn's quest for .400 stop short at .394. Had the strike not stopped play, Gould could have quite possibly seen a .400 hitter the year before. He must have a short memory. With tiny ballparks, watered down expansion era pitching, and a whole stable of strength and conditioning coaches in every clubhouse, I'd be surprised if we DIDN'T see a .400 hitter in the somewhat near future.

What do you think is better? a League team, or pickup games with your friends?

No he's an idiot.. Tony Gywnn was only a few hits away.. so was George Brett.

Who do you think is faster in running Jimmy Rollins or Jose Reyes??

I think it could happen. And never is a long time.

Tony Gwynn did it in 162 games (mid-season to the next midseason).

Who is the Single season MLB stolen base leader?

No, the last .400 hitter was in 1941. Since then, there are factors that make it harder to hit:
1. More night baseball- ball is easier to see in daylight.

2. Use of more pitchers during a game- batter would generally rather hit against the same pitcher 4 times in a game, but that doesn't happen much anymore.

3. In the '40s, there were a few elite players who focused on the game completely and devoted all of their activitiies to getting better. Ted Williams was such a hitter. Nowadays, as much as fans like to think players are in it for the money and not love of the game, money IS a motivating factor. To get the money, there are many, many players with disciplined training regiments- especially pitchers. Therefore, the elite hitter today does not have the advantage he had a half century ago.

Who is a better pitcher justin verlander or francisco liriano?

When I want to know more about baseball statistical probabilities, the first person I would ask would be a paleontologist.

It'll happen. There have been several players to come close over the last couple decades - George Brett's .390 in 1980 and Tony Gwynn's .394 in the shortened 1994 season being the closest. It may not happen for a while, but it will eventually happen.

If a baseball pitcher walks a batter and that batter scores does it count against that pithcers era?

For every hitter there is a pitcher that has his number. That could be around 16 games and around 64 at bats. Thats enough to bring that batting average down below .400.

Do you think a rod will keep it up(hitting home runs)or will he run out of juice?

So far. He will be wrong because there will be another .400 hitter.

Who are the top three RBI leaders of all time?

I think hes right. With the way relievers are used, especially with the left and right handed specialist, I don't think anybody's gonna hit .400 again. It was a different type of game from the pitching standpoint when guys like Williams did it.

Stolen basess?

I don't know if the fact he was a palenotologist gives him any credibility, but I will say this- the way pitching has become in this era, with relief pitchers, intentional walks, and the like, it will be very difficult. Ted Williams did not see three or four different pcithers in a game he made four or five plate appearances.

Anyone have any Manny Ramirez wallpapers?

One never knows! I always thought Ichiro of the Seattle Mariners would do it. Maybe he still will!

More Questions & Answers...
  • Which team has the best all around middle relief?
  • Is josh sitting next to me ?
  • How did multi Yankees manager Billy Martin come by the name Billy?
  • Do you think Edgar Martinez should be elected to the Hall of Fame?
  • My daughter was on the big screen at the Texas Rangers game at Ameriquest Field. How can I get a copy?
  • Who thinks the tigers can go all the wayy this year?
  • Roger Clemens?
  • What are 10 facts/stats I need to know about the Boston Red Sox, if I want to be a fan?
  • Ever since 200 which are the top 8 teams in the MLB?
  • Do you think dice is ready for the mlb?
  • Please Tell Me How to obtain an MLB autograph of a player,?

    This article contents is create by this website user, Sports1234.com doesn't promise its accuracy.
    Copyright 2007-2009 Sports1234.com     Contact us    Terms of Use

    Sports